You Can't Spreadsheet Culture
Why the deals that look cleanest on paper are often the ones that quietly unravel - and what the best integrations get right long before completion.
Karl Davies
Senior Partner - Operations
You can diligence the financials. You can stress-test the client bank. You can model the synergies down to the last pound of EBITDA. What you cannot do is put culture on a spreadsheet - and that, more than anything else, is why so many advisory acquisitions look strong on paper and feel disappointing in practice.
I've been around enough acquisitions to recognise the pattern. The deal team celebrates at completion. The principals shake hands. The internal comms go out, with the obligatory line about "shared values" and "exciting new chapters." And then, somewhere between month three and month nine, the friction starts.
It's Not the Systems. It Never Really Is.
When integrations go wrong, the immediate temptation is to blame the obvious things. The CRM migration that slipped. The back-office platform that wasn't quite as compatible as the demo suggested. The compliance frameworks that needed more reconciliation than anyone scoped for.
Those problems are real, but they're tractable. Systems can be migrated. Processes can be re-documented. Workflows can be redesigned. With enough budget, patience and good project management, the operational layer of an acquisition almost always gets sorted in the end.
What rarely gets sorted is the layer underneath: the unspoken rules.
The Unspoken Rules Run the Building
Every firm has them. They're rarely written down. They're almost never discussed in due diligence. But they govern more day-to-day behaviour than any policy document ever will.
Consider how differently two firms can treat the same situation:
- • In one firm, being late to a client meeting is a career-limiting event. In another, it's "just how it is."
- • In one firm, paraplanners are expected to challenge the adviser's recommendation. In another, they're expected to execute it without question.
- • In one firm, success is measured by revenue per head. In another, it's measured by client satisfaction scores.
- • In one firm, a mistake triggers a learning conversation. In another, it triggers a search for someone to blame.
None of these are operational differences. They're values differences. And when two firms with opposing values share a logo and a payroll, nobody wins.
The acquired team starts looking for exits. The acquirer starts wondering why the "easy wins" never materialised. And the clients - quietly, slowly - start sensing that the chemistry has changed.
How Misalignment Actually Shows Up
Cultural friction rarely arrives as a single dramatic event. It arrives as drift. Small frustrations. Conversations that don't happen. Decisions that take longer than they should. Senior people who used to be visible becoming harder to read.
Some of the early signals worth watching for after completion:
- • Quiet attrition among the acquired firm's most capable people
- • A noticeable drop in informal collaboration across the two teams
- • Decisions getting escalated that previously sat with the team
- • Client-facing language and standards beginning to diverge
- • Leadership meetings that focus on activity rather than direction
Each on its own is easy to explain away. Together, they're usually the early architecture of an underperforming integration.
The Best Integrations Start Before the Lawyers Do
The most successful integrations I've seen don't begin post-completion. They begin in due diligence - but not the financial kind. The human kind.
That means spending real time in each other's offices, or on each other's Teams calls, well before the legal process is underway. Watching how decisions actually get made. Sitting in on internal reviews. Listening for the way people talk about clients when they think the senior team isn't in the room.
It also means asking the uncomfortable questions, and being willing to sit with the answers:
- • How do you handle a mistake?
- • What actually happens when someone disagrees with the principal?
- • What does "good service" really look like here - not in the brochure, but on a Tuesday afternoon in March?
- • Where does the firm cut corners when nobody's watching?
- • Who in the business has informal influence that doesn't appear on the org chart?
When the Answers Make You Wince
Sometimes the answers will be reassuring. Sometimes they'll surprise you. And sometimes - if you're paying attention - they'll make you wince.
That wince is valuable information. It doesn't always mean the deal shouldn't happen. But it almost always means the deal isn't as cheap as it looks. Cultural debt, like financial debt, has to be repaid - and it usually compounds.
The firms that integrate well are the ones that price that debt in honestly from the start. They invest in the leadership conversations early. They define how decisions will be made together. They agree what "non-negotiable" actually means on both sides. And they're willing to walk away from deals where the values gap is wider than the synergy case can cover.
Culture Is the Asset You're Actually Buying
The financials tell you what the business has done. The systems tell you how it's organised. The clients tell you what it's worth. But it's the culture that tells you what it will become once your name is on the door.
If the cultures don't fit, the deal isn't cheaper than you think. It's just more expensive later.
Karl Davies
Senior Partner - Operations
Karl Davies is Senior Partner - Operations at Fortis Connect, working alongside principals and leadership teams through acquisitions, integrations and the operational and cultural work that makes growth sustainable.
Considering an acquisition - or living through the integration of one?
Let's talk about the cultural diligence and integration work that protects the value you've paid for.
Book a Conversation